“John Wesley recognized the ambiguities of Matthew 25:31-46 but did not allow them to deter him from responding to persons in need. To those who wondered ‘what does it avail to feed or clothe men’s bodies, if they are just dropping into everlasting fire?’ Wesley responded, ‘whether they will finally be lost or saved, you are expressly commanded to feed the hungry, and clothe the naked. If you can, and do not, whatever becomes of them, you shall go away into everlasting fire.’ He strongly resisted any attempts to narrow the scope of responsibility or to dull the intensity of the passage.”

From Christine D. Pohl, Making Room: Recovering Hospitality as a Christian Tradition

–

Brian Niece
www.brianniece.com
If you enjoyed this post, get free updates by email or RSS.Related Posts:

• People Love to Come and See You Burn
• What’s Love Got to Do with It?
• Balthasar Blog Conference
• Book Comments: “Being Consumed: Economics and Christian Desire” by William Cavanaugh
• Fire Fairytale

This little gem of a book is an easy read; quite unlike his previous Torture and Eucharist.  There are certain strains of familiarity with Marva J. Dawn’s Unfettered Hope.

Cavanaugh argues that our general notions of globalism and consumerism have been waterd down.  Or better yet, they have been too narrow.

In the face of globalism, Cavanaugh paints a Christian communal response that honors the particular in the macrocosms of cultural.

The bottom line is that we do not have an appropriate theology of God’s abundance.  Cavanaugh essentially seeks to answer the question, “Do we really believe God provides his people with all they need to be his people?”

If the answer is “Yes” then we have a different paradigm and story from which to live.  God’s Economy tells a different story with different practices and different reference points.

SO TELL ME SOMETHING:
Have you read the book?  What have you learned about God’s economy?

——

Brian Niece
www.brianniece.com
If you enjoyed this post, get free updates by email or RSS.Related Posts:

• Book Comments: “Selling Out the Church”
• On Reading the Hebrew Scripture — Part 1
• A Lenten Exercise: Analyzing Exile – Part 2
• A Lenten Exercise: Analyzing Exile – Conclusion
• Doing Church and Being Church

My, my, my … many theoretical problems with this book.

The historical study is very accurate and quite fascinating. The analysis and synthesis of the authors’ conclusions lead to a fallacy in method. They are prescribing a practice of the Church (and church, little “c”) that essentially does what they have accused the Church of historically doing: erecting human practices on scriptural grounds. Their methodology is flawed.

Though they argue for the full tenor of scripture, they do not grasp how that understanding is put into practice.

The authors’ criticism is leveled primarily at low-church Protestantism. And unfortunately, there is no talk of the redeeming and reconciling nature of the work of the gospel through Christian practices.

Everything they describe as organic church, I experience in my faith community. Yet, we own a building, we have paid staff, etc. We don’t play dress up on Sunday, nor some of the other things the authors find non-Biblical. But we do intend toward community: meaning our community is intentional.

Many of the criticisms of the book did not hit home with me. It seems that Viola and Barna have found a wonderfully subversive way to sell a lot of copies of a book. But in so doing they are misconstruing the analysis and pigeon-holing the possible practical implications their historicity affords.

For my part, I just listed the book in brand new condition at half.com … though I feel a bit bad to have someone else pay for it. At least it won’t continue to line the authors’ pockets.

SO TELL ME SOMETHING:
Have you read the book? What are your thoughts on the authors’ methodology?

——

Brian Niece
www.brianniece.com
If you enjoyed this post, get free updates by email or RSS.Related Posts:

• Book Comments: “Selling Out the Church”
• Semi-accidental Stumbled-upons
• The Lie of Positive, Practical Christianity
• Doing Church and Being Church
• Book Comments: “Being Consumed: Economics and Christian Desire” by William Cavanaugh

I especially think of my vocational setting. Individualistic, consumeristic America; specifically a bit south of “Bible Belt” territory (and closer to the ocean). For those in a parish who might ask “Why do we receive Holy Communion every week?”, or “Why do we stand for the reading of the Gospel text?”, or “Why do we light so many candles?”, or “Why do we extend our hands for the Blessing?”, etc., this book is a good starting place for conversation.

In my faith community, we are attempting to reclaim corporate worship as the place and time we simply worship God and are shaped, formed to go about loving and serving. We believe the work of the people gathered is to let the liturgy (gathering, word, sacrament, sending) be the shaping and forming means.

If you use a liturgical format in your worship (for example: God calls, we gather; God speaks, we listen and respond; God acts, we give thanks; God sends, we go) this book should serve as a necessary touchstone for reaching some sense of communal understanding and appreciation.

SO TELL ME SOMETHING:
How do you experience the liturgy in your local church worship?

——

Brian Niece
www.brianniece.com
If you enjoyed this post, get free updates by email or RSS.Related Posts:

• Book Comments: “Selling Out the Church”
• Doing Church and Being Church
• Book Comments: “Pagan Christianity”
• A Lenten Exercise: Analyzing Exile – Part 5
• Some Excellent Quotes from Jim Wallis

I highly recommend this book for any pastor with the firm conviction that form and content cannot be separated, who is also struggling with the outside pressures of church growth marketing agendas.

The authors pose the question “Can the market-driven church remain Christ’s church?” The answer comes scripturally and theologically as a resounding “No.”

The reason is that marketing is a concept of self-interested exchange, but Christianity is a concept of gift.

This book elucidates my belief that the ideology of “responsiveness” to felt needs (aka, church marketing) essentially reduces the church to a quivering mass of availability. Yet, Christ in scripture clearly intends the church to be a journey of people embodying Christ’s Gospel and the kingdom of God.

One of the gems from the book:

“You can’t market a community that is called to engage in such things as truth-telling, forgiveness, hospitality to strangers, self-sacrifice, and love of one’s enemies.”

It is a rule of life for my faith community that our vocation is to live in a way that demands our peculiar way of being be understood through experience. As in the book, marketing the church wholly undercuts and sidesteps this mission.

SO TELL ME SOMETHING:
Have you read the book?  What are your thoughts on church marketing?

——

Brian Niece
www.brianniece.com
If you enjoyed this post, get free updates by email or RSS.Related Posts:

• Book Comments: “Pagan Christianity”
• No Enemies
• All Our Sins
• What’s Love Got to Do with It?
• Book Comments: “Beyond Smells and Bells”