Sacramental Living

My last post has generated many interesting discussions (of course, those are happening by way of email or phone or IM, since many of you read but usually don’t post comments … no big deal; part of the fun of web 2.0 is that we can communicate however we choose).

I’ve been in discussions with like-minded folks and listened (or read) patiently while someone blasts my “radical” notions.

Having been an English (and Theatre Arts major) in school the first time around, I thought I’d put to use some of those history-of-the-English-language skills.

RADICAL: etymologically, the word “radical” comes from the Latin (radix) meaning “to the root.” Feel free to check me on this by clicking here. Looking at radical’s synonym visual family yields this:

From this visual it seems that a “radical” is someone who is revolutionary or extremist to the root about something in particular.

Don’t you think the Christian faith, the Christ-follower is to be radical? Shouldn’t we be engaged in life-long transformation to the root of all that we are? Shouldn’t every aspect of human experience be under constant conversion to the very base of all we do? Shouldn’t our core theme be radical discipleship? It seems this is what Jesus often calls for, invites others into. When Jesus says, “Come and see,” accepting that invitation means a life of change … to the root.

So allow me to stir up the hornet’s nest some more …

Here’s another un-truth I’ve learned from the church: the world is made up of two kingdoms (dualism).

I learned from the church that we Christians should gather in the “church” building as often as possible so that we might escape the evils of the world, be discipled to be more unlike the world, and be equipped to go out and win the world for Christ.

I don’t find that world-view with Jesus at all. Our ancient spiritual ancestors from the pages of Hebrew scripture displayed a type of dualism. They saw good and evil. Sometimes they saw both good and evil coming from God (try to make that one fit in our postmodern orthopraxy!). They felt “called apart” as a specially chosen people.

But Jesus fulfilled what they were progressively learning: God is dreaming to reconcile all of creation to God’s self!

Grappling with this revelation causes us to stop looking at parts of the world as sacred and parts of the world as … well, the world. All of it is God’s creation. All of it is sacred. All of it is being reconciled.

The question for the church is: Are we engaging with God’s activity in reconciling all of creation? Are we making disciples outside the church walls (into all the “world”)? Do we really believe that God’s grace goes before us and that Christ’s Spirit is already at work everywhere?

What I’ve unlearned about dualism is that Christ-followers should see all of creation as Jesus sees it. This is called messianic. And we see ourselves in this creation as ambassadors of and co-workers with the Messiah … everywhere we go!

SO TELL ME SOMETHING:
Do you have a dualistic or messianic view of creation?

——

Brian Niece
www.brianniece.com

If you enjoyed this post, get free updates by email or RSS.

Tags: radical, Christian, Christ-follower, discipleship, un-truth, dualism, messianic

A blogging friend of mine, Monte Asbury, chimed in on what he learned from the church that didn’t ring true. Thus, I’ll divulge what it started me thinking about.

The church has taught me that to be the church means to be attractional. Authentic Christ-followers should, indeed, lead irresistible lives. But this is not the idiom of attraction I learned. Apparently, the church is most effective when it attracts not-yet believers to its gatherings. I learned this from Vacation Bible School, Caravans, Bible Quizzing, intramural sports leagues, block parties, fall festivals, harvest celebrations, huge Easter celebrations that require hiring a string section, Easter pageants, revivals, missions weekends, back-to-school parties, special concerts, etc., etc., etc.

The thinking was that the more special the event, the more spectacular the goings on within the church building walls, the more readily not-yet believers would be awed into a pleasing relationship with Jesus.

I learned that a lot of effort goes into these special events. I learned that if we build it, they will come. I learned that Jesus was a great spectacle, a bastion of entertainment, a religious-colored festival. I learned that Jesus was into crowds.

I’ve discovered this is an un-truth.

As I follow the lectionary and read from my family scrapbook (Scripture), I’m convinced that Jesus — and thereby, the gospel — isn’t about an attractional event.

Instead the gospel is about an incarnational life.

Jesus did occasionally preach / teach to great crowds. Yet, when he plainly extolled the cost of discipleship, the crowds dwindled. Near the end of his public ministry, he was the focus of crowds once again. Yet, this time they killed him.

Jesus’ most effective ministry happened one-on-one and in small groups. Jesus cared about individuals.

Jesus did not ask the thirsty to come to the great big water fountain at the synagogue. Instead, he went to the well that thirsty people frequented and gave a woman living water.

Jesus didn’t have a big potluck in order to feed people’s bellies while feeding their souls. Instead, he gathered with twelve around a small table and gave them his body and blood.

Jesus didn’t build magnificent buildings and point to them saying, “Here I have built my church.” Instead, he called his disciple with the most leadership potential an adversary, then promised to build a community of hope on his shoulders.

Jesus didn’t teach every Sabbath. Instead, he took his disciples with him through a field on the Sabbath, picked the grain for breakfast, and lived the gospel right in front of them.

How can the church I serve become incarnational? It won’t happen with great programs. Nor will it happen by meeting in the building we mistakenly call “the church” once or twice a week.

But it might happen by remembering that we are now Christ’s body. It might happen by rehearsing what Jesus did. It might happen by sacrificing all our false realities for a gospel that is lived and breathed in our communities.

Redemption begins when un-truths are un-learned. Then our hearts of stone are replaced with living hearts. With so much body-talk in Scripture — and a God who inhabited a body like mine — how can I call myself a Christ-follower if I’m not living a mission of incarnation all the time?

The beauty of this redeeming process is that the very church which taught me the un-truth is the church that shows me how to un-learn it and to live differently. For all the church’s flaws, it’s still the church through which God reconciles the world. I choose to be part of the reconciliation.

SO TELL ME SOMETHING:
What’s an un-truth that you’ve learned? And how are you un-learning it?

——

Brian Niece
www.brianniece.com

If you enjoyed this post, get free updates by email or RSS.

Tags: church, attractional, Jesus, incarnational

I have grand designs for effecting the world for Christ:

• I envision a church that no longer exists for its members, but for the life of the world;
• I dream of a paradigm shift for the southern US church, from a dying and irrelevant entity to a community of hope and grace for everyone.
• etc. etc. whatever …

Yet, as I anticipate the soon arrival of my second child (should be any day now!), I am aware that if my kids – my family – are not alive in Christ and clinging to the God of creation for meaning in life, then I have failed. All my ideas for paradigm shifts and missional church don’t mean much if my family isn’t consecrated daily to the general will of God.

So, today I give my life away for Eliot, for Tobi, for Heather. What will I sacrifice today so that their futures are swept up into the grace of Christ?

SO TELL ME SOMETHING:
Who will you die for today? Why?

——

Brian Niece
www.brianniece.com

If you enjoyed this post, get free updates by email or RSS.

Tags: paradigm shift, hope, grace, kids, family, sacrifice